by: Dr. Moshe Sokolow Show I. The Jewish Calendar- General Observations
|
Northern Hemisphere | Southern Hemisphere | |
A. 22 March – 21 June | Spring (day longer than night) | Fall (night longer than a day) |
B. 22 June – 22 September | Summer (day longer than night) | Winter (night longer than a day) |
C. 23 Sept. – 22 December | Fall (night longer than a day) | Spring (day longer than night) |
D. 23 Dec. – 21 March | Winter (night longer than a day) | Summer (day longer than night) |
Now we can see the dimensions of the problem very clearly. Since the autumn (Tishrei) season commences – in the Northern Hemisphere, which is our primary concern – on the 23rd of September, then the 60th day later is November 21st. Why, then do we not say Tal U-Matar until the 4th of December (13 days later)?
III. Tal-U-Matar: How we Arrived at December 4th
A. The Problem with Shemuel’s Calculations
To restate the problem we shall now endeavor to solve: Since the autumn (Tishrei) season commences – in the Northern Hemisphere, which is our primary concern – on the 23rd of September, then the 60th day later is November 21st. Why, then do we not say Tal U-Matar until the 4th of December (13 days later)? The determination of the equinox (tekufa) for the purposes of Tal U-Matar was originally made according to the rules set down by the Amora Shemuel – the same who ruled that the Halakhah in the Diaspora follows Hananiah – in Eruvin 56a:
ואין בין תקופה לתקופה אלא תשעים ואחד יום ושבע שעות ומחצה
i.e., The Tekufot are separated by 91 days, 7 ½ hours. Multiply 91 days 7 ½ hours by four seasons and the result is a year calculated to be exactly 365 ¼ days (364 days + 30 hours). The problem, however, is that a more exact astronomical calculation of the length of a year is 365 days, 5 hours, 48 minutes, and 46 seconds. As a result of this discrepancy of 11 minutes and 14 seconds, the tekufa has slowly moved forward during the last 2,000 years at the rate of one day every 128 years, and about 8 days each millennium.
11 min. 14 sec. (11.25 hrs.) ÷ 1,440 (minutes. in a day: 60 x 24) = 128 128 ÷ 1,000 years = 7.8
B. Pope Gregory and the New Calendar
The Catholic Church, interestingly enough, was the first to address this discrepancy.
Note: The Nicene Council, in 325, had correctly fixed March 21 (the vernal equinox) as the date which would determine the Easter holiday. Every 128 years, as we explained, March 21 moved forward, relative to the sun, by one full day. By 1582 the discrepancy had reached 10 days. Pope Gregory XIII decided to drop the extra ten days from the calendar by making the day after Thursday, October 4, 1582, into Friday, October 15, in a new calendar named “Gregorian” in his honor. To ensure that the problem remained corrected, Gregory also eliminated three leap years every 400 years (remember that the Tekufah moves forward one day every 128 years – according to Shemuel – and 3 x 128 = 384), namely, in the century years not divisible by 400. This results in an average year of 364.2425 days, at which rate it would now take 3,300 years to accumulate an extra day.
C. A Little “Jewish” Math
The result of these alterations is that – in the 20th century – the day which would have been September 23 according to the Julian (Shemuel’s) calendar is October 7 of the Gregorian calendar, and the 60th day following October 7 is December 5. Since we begin Tal U-Matar during the Ma’ariv service, it turns out to be said beginning with the night of December 4. Every fourth year, however (in the Jewish year divisible by four), the tekufa will begin after tzet ha-kokhavim on October 7, so the 60th day of those years will be December 6, and Tal U-Matar will commence on the evening of December 5.
Note: While the tekufa always falls on October 7, each year it begins 6 hours later – remember that it is still calculated according to Shemuel (and Julian) who assumes an exact 364¼ day year – so in each 4-year cycle, the tekufa begins, sequentially, at 3 AM, 9 AM, 3 PM and 9 PM – which is later than tzet hakokhavim. If you are wondering how the tekufa can always remain on October 7 when the year following 9 PM it should fall at 3 AM of October 8, remember that the year in which the tekufa comes at 9 PM is the year preceding a civil leap year which uses up the extra day. Since the year 2000 in the Gregorian calendar will be a leap year too, the December 4-5 dates will continue throughout the 21st century. However, since 2100 will not be a leap year (it’s not divisible by 400), the tekufa in 2101 will move up one day (to October 8), and Tal U-Matar will move to December 5-6. This pattern repeats itself, so every 400 years Tal U-Matar is said three days later.
IV. Problems for Europe and the Southern Hemisphere
Thus far, we have explained how the nuances of the Julian and Gregorian calendars determine the dates on which the prayer of Tal U-Matar is inserted into Birkat HaShanim. However, one major problem remains. The Gemara in Ta’anit (see above) stipulated the 60th day of the Tishrei season as the date for beginning Tal U-Matar in the Diaspora, which refers specifically to Babylonia, and even Rambam (see above) broadened the Halakhah only enough to include Syria, Egypt and countries nearby or with similar (climatological?) conditions. What has any of that to do with Europe and North America – let alone the entire Southern Hemisphere – whose climates are significantly different? Should the Jews of Brazil or Australia pray for rain from December through April, when their winter months are June-September (see the tekufa charts above)? Does it make any sense for the Jews of the United States to pointedly stop praying for rain on the first day of Pesah when that is not too late – in some places – even for snow and, in any event, it continues to rain throughout the year?
A. Mishnah and Gemara
To answer these questions, we have to go back to the Gemara and return, via medieval and modern responsa, to the present. The Gemara, first of all, makes provision for different climates, allowing the prayer for Tal U-Matar to be inserted in the blessing of Shome’a Tefillah, rather than Birkhat haShanim (Ta’anit 14b):
שלחו ליה בני נינוה לרבי: כגון אנן, דאפילו בתקופת תמוז בעינן מטרא, היכי נעביד? כיחידים דמינן או כרבים דמינן? כיחידים דמינן- וב”שומע תפלה”, או כרבים דמינן ובברכת השנים? שלח להו: כיחידים דימתו, וב”שומע תפלה.”
i.e., The inhabitants of Nineveh inquired of Rabbi (Yehuda the Nasi): We who need rain even during the summer – how shall we act? As individuals (who insert their prayer) during Shome’a Tefillah, or as a community (entitled to add the insert) during Birkhat haShanim?
Rabbi replied: You are regarded as individuals and (should pray for rain) during Shome’a Tefillah. The Gemara rules according to Rabbi, but it also records the conflicting opinions of Rabbi Yehuda and Rav Nahman who permit local communities – such as Nineveh – to recite Tal U-Matar in the Birkhat haShanim at whatever time suits them best:
בזמן הזה- הכל לפי השנים, הכל לפי המקומות, הכל לפי הזמן!
While it is clear, then, that Diaspora communities can only say Tal U-Matar in Birkhat haShanim during their winter, it is unclear whether the Gemara intended them to follow the custom of Eretz Yisrael and begin on 7 Heshvan, or to follow Babylonian custom and begin on the 60th day of the Tekufah. Furthermore, since – even with Nineveh – it only relates to the summer season in Eretz Yisrael – it still fails to resolve the dilemma created by the unique situation of the Southern Hemisphere! We shall deal, here, with two representative examples: Provence and Brazil.
[Note: A comprehensive survey of all the data pertaining to this problem, drawn from a host of Rishonim and Acharonim, is contained in an essay entitled: The Jewish Prayer for Rain in the Post-Talmudic Diaspora by Arnold and Daniel Lasker, which appears in the A.J.S. Review vol. IX no. 2 (Fall, 1984), particularly on pages 150-161.]
B. Provence and the Custom of R. Asher
In the Middle Ages, we find, in practice, that Europe (and North Africa) followed the Babylonian custom – with the definite exception of Provence (and the possible exception of Kairouan, Tunisia) which followed the custom of Eretz Yisrael. While their actual practices are well attested to, their origins, however, are not, and it remains uncertain whether they were originally based upon Talmudic exegesis or meteorology. In other words, when Hananiah describes the practice of Babylonia, he refers to it as “the Golah.” Is that just an idiomatic expression, or was it intended all along to denote ALL Diaspora communities? On the other hand, it just so happens that in Provence (and Tunisia) the rainy season begins in September or October. The Provencal custom is reported approvingly by R. Asher in his commentary on Ta’anit 12 b, as follows:
ותמה אני למה אנו נוהגין כבני גולה בהא. נהי דהש”ס שלנו בבלי מ”מ דבר התלוי בארץ אם בבל היתה מצולת מים ולא היו צריכות למים כל הארצות צריכין למים במרחשון למה נאחר השאלה עד ששים לתקופה. והדבר ידוע אם לא היה מטר יורד עד ששים לתקופה היה הזרע אבד ולמה לא נעשה כמשנתנו. ובפרובינצא ראיתי שהיו שואלין את בגשמים המרחשון וישר מאד בעיני.
i.e., I am surprised that we follow the Babylonian practice in this regard. While our Talmud is Babylonian, the matter (of praying for rain) depends upon the Land (of Israel). Why should we not follow their custom? Even if Babylonia has abundant water and does not need rain, other countries need rain in Heshvan so why delay the prayer until the 60th day of the season? Why should we not follow the ruling of the Mishna? In Provence, I have seen that they pray for rain beginning with Heshvan and I heartily approve! R. Asher, in fact, not only argued for starting Tal U-Matar in Heshvan, but, in a teshuvah, he wrote in 1313, argued that the prayer could even be continued beyond Pesach and all the way to Shavuot if local conditions warranted it. This opinion, however, was rejected even by his son in the Tur, and the phraseology of the Shulchan Arukh dispels all the ambiguity which inheres in the Talmudic term Golah by stating categorically (Orah Hayyim 117:1):
ומתחילין לשאול מטר בחוצה לארץ .. יום ס’ אחר תקופת תשרי
i.e., Outside of the Land of Israel, one begins the prayer … on the 60th day of the autumn season. Note: To contrast two more recent opinions, Abraham Geiger, the Reform leader, ruled that German Jews might say Tal U-Matar all year round, while the Arukh haShulchan – perhaps in reaction? – stipulates that:
וכן הלכה וכל המפקפק בזה ראוי לעונש
i.e., Whoever doubts the law [decided in the Shulchan Arukh] deserves to be punished. Incidentally, in referring to the rejection of the decision of R. Asher, he adds:
מ”מ כתב הרא”ש בעצמו שלא נתקבלו דבריו כלל ע”ש ואכלו יצא בת קול לעשות כבני בבל.
Since R. Asher himself acknowledged that his opinion was not accepted, it is as though a heavenly voice (bat kol) decreed to follow Babylonian custom.
C. The Southern Hemisphere
Interestingly enough, the first she’elah to be sent back to Europe from the “New World” concerned Tal U-Matar. The first Jewish settlement in the New World began, in 1637, in the Portuguese colony of Recife, in Brazil, and one of the first religious problems they encountered was reckoning the proper time to say Tal U-Matar. On the one hand, they were all accustomed to following the Babylonian custom, which had won out, time and again, overall attempts — such as that of R. Asher — to modify it in accordance with local conditions. On the other hand, however, was the overwhelming illogic of praying for rain during Brazil’s summer, and forgoing the prayer precisely when rain was needed, just because the tradition was founded in another era and a different hemisphere! Congregation Zur Yisrael raised this question in a letter to Rabbi Chaim Shabbetai of Salonica, whose answer set the precedent by which most of the Jews of South America and Australia abide by this very day.
Basing himself upon the opinions of Rambam in his commentary to Mishna Ta’anit, Rabbi Shabbetai ruled that since during the months of Nisan through Tishrei prayers for rain may be recited only in Shome’a Tefillah as individuals, and since one should not have to pray for rain at a time in which it would be harmful to him, therefore the Jews of Brazil should:
(a) never say Tal U-Matar in Birkhat haShanim;
(b) never even say Mashiv haRu’ah U’Morid haGeshem
(c) during their winter they were entitled, however, to say Tal U-Matar in Shome’a Tefillah if the need arose.
[Note: While Veten Tal U-Matar Uveracha constitutes the entire prayer for rain in the Ashkenazic liturgy, the Sephardic prayer for rain actually changes the whole text of Birkhat HaShanim. Here, for purposes of comparison, are their versions of this berakha: Sephardic-Summer, and Sephardic-Winter. The Sephardic texts are from the siddur of the Spanish and Portuguese Synagogue, known as She’erith Israel.] It may be of interest to note, in closing, that since South American Sephardic Jews do not say Tal U-Matar in Birkhat HaShanim at all, many of them have never seen the Winter version!
Note: See all related sources here.