Tegris, Inc. v. Bryce, LLC et al Filed: October 19, 2022 as 1:2022cv05741 Plaintiff: Tegris, Inc. Defendant: Bryce, LLC and Brycer Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement Bigfoot 4X4, Inc. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto Filed: October 19, 2022 as 1:2022cv05743 Plaintiff:
Bigfoot 4X4, Inc. Defendant: The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement Plaintiff v. Defendant Filed:
October 19, 2022 as 1:2022cv05744 Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus Gerber v. Gutstein, MD, Ltd. et al Filed: October 19, 2022 as 1:2022cv05745 Plaintiff: Robert Gerber Defendant: Daniel A. Gutstein, MD, Ltd., Daniel A. Gutstein and John Does 1-10 Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment Trademark Rightsholder Identified
in Exhibit 1 v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" Filed: October 19, 2022 as 1:2022cv05746 Plaintiff: Trademark Rightsholder Identified in Exhibit 1 Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement Windy City Moving, Inc. d/b/a New City Moving v. Collins Family Movers, Inc Filed: October 19, 2022 as 1:2022cv05748 Plaintiff: Windy City Moving, Inc. d/b/a New City Moving
Defendant: Collins Family Movers, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Smith v. Truitt
Filed: October 19, 2022 as 1:2022cv05747
Petitioner: Keenon Smith
Respondent: Charles Truitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Samples v. Bear Down Logistics XL, Inc.
Filed: October 19, 2022 as 1:2022cv05750
Plaintiff: Chris Samples
Defendant: Bear Down Logistics XL, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: October 19, 2022 as 3:2022cv50362
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: October 19, 2022 as 1:2022cv05751
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
Northern District of Illinois
Trials of corrupt former governors of Illinois, Chicago officials who rigged city hiring, individuals who supported foreign terrorism, international drug smugglers, bosses of Chicago’s violent drug-trafficking street gangs, corporate executives who cheated public shareholders, and organized crime bosses who were responsible for notorious murders ― these are among the recent, successful prosecutions that distinguish the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois. While earning a reputation built over decades for battling organized crime and aggressively prosecuting public corruption, the federal prosecutor’s office in Chicago continues to uphold that tradition, even as its top priorities now also include anti-terrorism, violent crime associated with narcotics and street gangs, health care fraud and cybercrime. And extensive efforts are dedicated to providing assistance and restitution to victims of crime. In the civil arena, in addition to defending the United States against all varieties of civil claims, The U.S. Attorney’s Office recovers hundreds of millions of dollars in losses to the United States and penalties from companies and individuals who defraud federal programs. Among recent examples are judgments against an insurance company that discriminated against pregnant women and pharmacies that cheated Medicare. Read more...